-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mention source of elements
database in docstring
#87
Mention source of elements
database in docstring
#87
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #87 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.70% 88.70%
=======================================
Files 77 77
Lines 7453 7453
Branches 1200 1200
=======================================
Hits 6611 6611
Misses 572 572
Partials 270 270 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Chantler reference is already mentioned in other docstrings, but way of mentioning is quite inconsistent. |
5d9197c
to
003f15a
Compare
@jlaehne, is it better now with the references? |
Maybe align also the citation in the Bibliography of the User Guide (use DOI, it currently uses the subtitle and not the title of the page). |
Co-authored-by: Jonas Lähnemann <[email protected]>
As mentioned in #85 (comment).
Progress of the PR
elements
database in docstring,upcoming_changes
folder (seeupcoming_changes/README.rst
),docs/readthedocs.org:exspy
build of this PR (link in github checks)